On 1/24/2012 3:12 AM, plieger wrote:
Hi John and Martin,

John: Thanks a lot for the information. I put the MSGnavigation properties in 
the file, and the
projection now fits much better than the vertical perspective projection. 
Attached you will see a
screenshot of the longitude variable with this projection. At the edges of the 
globe I still see a
small offset of 0-0.1 degrees, but this is changing more or less where you 
query.
I tinkered a little bit with the height_from_earth_center and the semi_major 
and semi_minor axis,
but did not result in a noticable change of the projection. The 2D latitude and 
longitude fields are
always provided with these files so the projection can be verified with these 
fields.

char projection
   projection:proj4_params = "+proj=geos +lon_0=0.000000 +lat_0=0 +h=35807.414063 
+a=6378.169 +b=6356.5838" ;
   projection:grid_mapping_name = "MSGnavigation" ;
   projection:longitude_of_projection_origin = 0.f ;
   projection:latitude_of_projection_origin = 0.f ;
   projection:semi_major_axis = 6356584.f ;
   projection:semi_minor_axis = 6378169.f ;
   projection:height_from_earth_center = 4.216397e+07f ;
   projection:scale_x = 35785.83f ;
   projection:scale_y = -35785.83f ;


Hi Maarten:

Yes, it seems as good as Ive seen.

How did you generate your projection coordinates and your lat/lon coordinates?

John




_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to