Dear Jonathan,
Yes, that's fine. If nobody comes forward to say they've started it in
the next day or so, I'll put together a first draft.
Regards,
Ros.
On 01/03/12 15:03, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
Dear Ros
As far as I know, this has not been done. I have a vague memory that I might
have asked you if you felt like having a go. :-) If you did, it would be
valuable. We definitely need these rules. There are quite a number of things
that can be checked for section 9 compliance.
Thanks and best wishes
Jonathan
----- Forwarded message from Rosalyn Hatcher<[email protected]> -----
Before I go ahead and start this, I just wanted to check if anybody
has already written or started to write the "Requirements and
Recommendations" for Chapter9 - Discrete Sampling Geometries to go
into the CF Conformance and Requirements Document? I vaguely
remember someone saying they'd give it a go.....
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
Rosalyn Hatcher
NCAS Computational Modelling Services
Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading,
Earley Gate, Reading. RG6 6BB
Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0) 118 378 6016
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
