On Mar 13, 2012, at 02:08, Robert Muetzelfeldt wrote:

>  Maybe lots of published data analysis has been undertaken using CF Standard 
> Names and it's simply that the authors did not feel the need to mention it, 
> but that seems a bit unlikely.

Why does that seem unlikely?  CF is a framework capability, and the users of it 
who write papers likely simultaneously used 100 other framework capabilities as 
they did their research. CF would not stand out any more than their computer's 
operating system or the tool they used to make their plots.

A curse of the infrastructure providers, whose works are long in service but 
rarely explicitly appreciated. :->

John


Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org   

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to