Hi Christian, These names look fine (I think there's a missing underscore in the first) so we would have:
upward_sensible_heat_flux_in_air; W m-2 upward_latent_heat_flux_in_air; W m-2. The syntax is consistent with many existing names and we already have surface fluxes for the same quantities. I assume that these are 3-D quantities and you would use a vertical coordinate variable to specify the vertical location of the flux. These names are accepted for inclusion in the standard name table. I have already committed the changes for today's update, however, another update will take place one month from now and it will include these names. Best wishes, Alison ------ Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065 NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre Email: [email protected] STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory R25, 2.22 Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:cf-metadata- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of christian.wetzel > > Sent: 22 March 2012 12:15 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [CF-metadata] upward_sensible_heatflux_in_air, > > upward_latent_heat_flux_in_air > > > > Hi, > > > > as proposed earlier, I would like to have the following names added > to > > the standard name table: > > > > upward_sensible_heatflux_in_air > > upward_latent_heat_flux_in_air > > > > See http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf- > metadata/2011/027518.html > > for reference. > > > > Greetings, > > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > > CF-metadata mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata -- Scanned by iCritical. _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
