Wouldn't you also need the profile dimension on the temperature and pressure 
variables in order to connect them all as part of the same profile collection?

Jim Biard
Research Scholar
Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites
Remote Sensing and Applications Division
National Climatic Data Center
151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801-5001

[email protected]
828-271-4900

On Apr 30, 2012, at 8:46 AM, John Caron wrote:

> On 4/29/2012 5:33 PM, andrew walsh wrote:
>> Hi John,
>> 
>> My responses inline below.
>> 
>> Andrew
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Caron" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:39 AM
>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Ocean CTD data following CF Conventions v1.6
>> 
>> 
>>> Hi Andrew:
>>> 
>>> You can use a dimension=1 instead of a scalar.
>> 
>> OK, you mean if one used the  vector method.
> 
> yes
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> But you cant use
>>> 
>>> lat(lat)
>>> lon(lon)
>>> time(time)
>>> 
>>> the correct usage in the single profile case would be:
>>> 
>>> lat(profile)
>>> lon(profile)
>>> time(profile)
>> 
>> So, do you mean in the vector method have this? (simpler I guess to
>> have common profile dimension = 1)
> 
> yes, you cant use incorrect dimensions, even when they are all = 1.
> 
>> 
>> dimensions:
>> profile=1
>> pressure = 57
>> 
>> variables:
>> lat(profile)
>> lon(profile)
>> time(profile)
>> pressure(pressure)
>> temperature(pressure)
>> 
>> Instead of this?
>> 
>> Dimensions:
>> time=1
>> lat=1
>> lon=1
>> pressure=57
>> 
>> Variables:
>> time(time)
>> lat(lat)
>> lon(lon)
>> pressure(pressure)
>> temperature(pressure)
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to