I personally have no objections, but acting as an ad hoc moderator-lite, does Randy's suggestion from the 22nd March need agreeing on, one way or another?
All the best David ---- Original message from John Caron (10AM 10 May 12) > Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:35:04 -0600 > From: John Caron <[email protected]> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 > Thunderbird/12.0.1 > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [CF-metadata] Accept geostationary projection > > If no one has any objections, i move that we accept this ticket: > > "Adding the geostationary projection." > > https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/72 > > the changes needed to the spec are at the bottom of the ticket, we > didnt know how to change the top part. > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata -- David Hassell National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS) Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 243, Reading RG6 6BB, U.K. Tel : 0118 3785613 Fax : 0118 3788316 E-mail: [email protected] _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
