Dear all > If no one can provide a reasonably knowledgeable response, proposing a new > definition would (a) potentially make the most desirable > clarification/modification and (b) elicit any conflicts from anyone on the > CF-metadata list. One of the list minders will undoubtedly weigh in on this > when they have a chance.
I agree with both John and Tom, regarding Randy's concern about toa_bidirectional_reflectance. I don't have any expertise on this subject. Either a new definition can be proposed for the existing name, or if there is a need to have more precise quantities, more standard names can be introduced with more specific definitions. Best wishes Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
