Dear Alison, all,

    thanks for bringing this to a conclusion, and thank you also for your 
thoughtful comment. I like your idea of broadening the definitions somewhat to 
allow for a little more flexibility in the practical use without having to 
invent new standard_names for every new combination of sectors. I am only 
wondering (but this should be a discussion under a different thread), whether 
"comment" is the right attribute for such things. Without having checked the 
standard_name table for this, I assume that there are some other occasions 
where additional clarification is at least useful if not mandatory. "Comment" 
is rather general and optional. For the sake of improving CF to become better 
suited for interoperability purposes, it may be a good idea to either formalize 
the way the "comment" attribute shall be used (the standard_name table could 
indicate if there should be a comment attribute available for any given 
standard_name), or, alternatively, to extend the syntax of standard_names to 
add "mandatory" or "recommended" comments right there (for example 
"tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_carbon_monoxide_due_to_emission_from_energy_production_and_distribution:
 IPCC source categories 1A1 and 1B as defined in the 2006 IPCC guidelines for 
national greenhouse gas inventories".)

With this, I hope that we can close the discussion on the emission names soon 
and let them see the light of the next table.

Best regards,

Martin



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Juli 2012 12:01
An: Schultz, Martin; [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [CF-metadata] Warming up old stuff - 4 (emissions)

Dear Martin, All,

Martin Schultz proposed a set of emission names about 12 months ago and there 
has been some sporadic discussion since. I would like to draw this discussion 
to a conclusion so that we are in a position to include these quantities, which 
are clearly of fundamental importance to the climate community, in the standard 
name table.

To summarize the situation so far: [...]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kennen Sie schon unseren neuen Film? http://www.fz-juelich.de/film
Kennen Sie schon unsere app? http://www.fz-juelich.de/app
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to