Randy... I see no reason why not. As we have discussed for geo satellites, though, we may need to make extensions to get some conventions established where they do not already exist (e.g., 'band') so that application developers can put in code to recognize these conventions.
tom On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Randy Horne <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all: > > Is it a given that the CF conventions apply to data below, at, or above the > surface of the earth ? > > > very respectfully, > > randy > > ____________________________________ > > Randy C. Horne ([email protected]) > Principal Engineer, Excalibur Laboratories Inc. > voice & fax: (321) 952.5100 > url: http://www.excaliburlabs.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cf-satellite mailing list > [email protected] > For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ -- Tom Whittaker University of Wisconsin-Madison Space Science & Engineering Center (SSEC) Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) 1225 W. Dayton Street Madison, WI 53706 USA ph: +1 608 262 2759 _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
