Suggestion 'presence_of_surface_snow' should have been 
'presence_of_surface_snow_cover' to maintain consistency....
________________________________________
From: CF-metadata [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lowry, Roy K. 
[[email protected]]
Sent: 05 September 2012 19:49
To: Ute Brönner; Jim Biard
Cc: Heather Brown; Raymond Nepstad; [email protected]; Alisa Young
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for standard name "snow_cover_binary_mask"

Dear All,

It's becoming clear that we need a Standard Name component to cover boolean 
values whose trigger point may then be specified elsewhere as Jonathan stated.  
In the biological domain, the syntax 'presence_of_x' where x is a taxon name is 
often used.  Could this be adopted giving the Standard Name 
'presence_of_surface_snow' for Jim and opening the door for a raft of Standard 
Names to cover Ute's use case?

Cheers, Roy.

________________________________________
From: CF-metadata [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ute Brönner 
[[email protected]]
Sent: 05 September 2012 18:40
To: Jim Biard
Cc: Heather Brown; Raymond Nepstad; [email protected]; Alisa Young
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for standard name "snow_cover_binary_mask"

Hei,
Wouldn't that feature come in handy for other grids as well where we would like 
to mark sth. like "exposed" or "not exposed"? So I would suggest to make it 
snow independent.

Regards,
Ute


Am 05.09.2012 um 18:31 schrieb "Jim Biard" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:

Hi.

I'd like to propose the new standard name "snow_cover_binary_mask".  There is a 
NOAA snow coverage extent product that is being put into netCDF format.  The 
product is derived from the IMS Daily Northern Hemisphere Snow & Ice Analysis.  
It is a grid in which cells are marked as snow-covered or not snow-covered.  
The GCMD already has the keywords "Cryosphere > Snow/Ice > Snow Cover" and 
"Terrestrial Hydrosphere > Snow/Ice > Snow Cover", which are applied to the 
source product.

In this particular product, grid cells are marked as snow-covered when > 42% of 
the cell indicates the presence of snow.

I'd appreciate any thoughts or comments.

Grace and peace,

Jim

Jim Biard
Research Scholar
Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites
Remote Sensing and Applications Division
National Climatic Data Center
151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801-5001

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
828-271-4900

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata--
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to