Hello Ben

I have put an example section at the bottom of the wiki page 
https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/wiki/PotentialDataModelTypes#Example1

I think you are right that including examples helps to illustrate the 
conversation, I hope I have done so here.

In particular, I have noted:
  Coordinate:
    This type does not have an example, it can be thought of as an abstract 
type, which provides common functionality to it's tangible sub-types. 
so my examples of Coordinates are all DimensionCoordinates and 
AuxiliaryCoordinates.

all the best
mark

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] on behalf of Ben Domenico
Sent: Tue 18/09/2012 22:48
To: Hedley, Mark
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Data Model Development | types
 
Hi Mark,

Thanks for making a great start.  One addition I might suggest is to have
an example or two for each type.   That would really help me.  In the list
of types you start with, I think I understand most of them, but the
definition of "Coordinate" leaves me a bit unsure.   That's  a place where
an example of a coordinate (especially a coordinate that's not a
DimensionCoordinate) would help.

Thanks.

-- Ben

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Hedley, Mark <[email protected]
> wrote:

>
> I have made an attempt at naming and defining (a short textual statement)
> a set of Types (or Constructs) for the data model:
>
> https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/wiki/PotentialDataModelTypes#Types
>
> I would encourage people to review this list and edit the wiki with
> alternatives and additions.  My hope is to develop a long list which we can
> whittle down by agreement to a coherent set.
>
> Jonathan: I think there are a set of alignments and a set of misalignments
> between this page and the text you posted on #68 (
> https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/68#comment:22).  Would you be
> content to consider these and add entries to the Wiki to encourage further
> discussion?
>
>
> Once an initial discussion has taken place, I will add a diagram of
> relations to this page, to encourage further discussion; I thought this
> might be premature to do today.
> If a diagram would be helpful at this stage, let me know, and I will
> publish a draft.
>
> all the best
> mark
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
>



_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to