Hi Andreas,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
> Of Andreas Hilboll
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 2:53 AM
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard names for column amounts
> (atmospheric
> chemistry)
>

   in addition to what Philip said, let me try to guide you a little more 
specifically concerning some of your questions. Don't feel frightened about the 
discussions that are going to come up. Eventually, there will be an agreement, 
and in the end it's usually a wise decision if you look at it from a little 
distance later. The following comments may help you to identify the potential 
areas for discussion - the better your proposal will address these points "in 
the spirit" of existing CF names, the easier it will be to get the proposal 
accepted smoothly.

> * The canonical way to specify tropospheric NO2 columns in
>   molecules cm^-2 would be to use the standard name
>   "mole_content_of_nitrogen_dioxide_in_troposphere_layer", or rather
>   "troposphere_mole_content_of_nitrogen_dioxide",
>   together with a units attribute of "molecules cm^-2"?

I agree with Philip here, that "troposphere_mole_content..." seems the more 
natural choice. Obviously, this can easily be extended to 
"stratosphere_mole_content..." if you provide a clear definition of what 
"stratosphere" means (in fact I just saw that "troposphere" is also not defined 
very well, it only says "in this layer of the atmosphere"!). We should probably 
change this definition to something more specific, such as "the layer of the 
atmosphere between the earth surface and the tropopause. Generally, the 
tropopause will be defined via the reversal of the temperature gradient with 
altitude as specified by WMO. Other definitions of tropopause are possible, and 
if one of these is used, it should be explained in a comment attribute." -- In 
analogy, the "stratosphere" should be defined as the layer between the 
tropopause and the stratopause.


>
> * What can I do for
> "atmosphere_mole_content_of_nitrogen_dioxide_between_surface_and_XhPa
> ",
> where X is 500?

Here, my suggestion would be to go for the general term "atmosphere_layer" and 
request either a generic comment attribute or a more specific attribute 
(something like "layer_extent" ?) where the exact specification of "between ... 
and ..." should be provided. I don't believe that it would be possible to agree 
on a small confined set of numbers, and since a standard_name is static and 
cannot contain variable elements, one would have to define thouands of  
standard names in order to be able to distinguish any layer between X and Y.

>
> * What about
> "atmosphere_mole_content_of_nitrogen_dioxide_between_XhPa_and_tropopa
> use",
> where X is 500?

Here again, we should try to find a general solution with an additional 
attribute. In fact this discussion could/should be broader than for atmospheric 
composition only, because similar problems might be present for soil variables 
(soil layer between X and Y), and in the ocean as well. In fact you can look 
into the definition of "frozen_water_content_of_soil_layer" as an example. This 
is formulated rather vaguely, I think. So, perhaps this could be a starting 
point for a more general discussion on how to uniformly express "layers" in the 
CF model.

... I just saw your folow-up email. That is a good start!

Best regards,

Martin


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to