Hi Alison, Christophe, et al.,

I agree that this name follows existing patterns.

It would be good to add a comment similar to the one we added for 
atmosphere_mole_content_of_ozone (although we don't currently have the 
corresponding layer version of 
equivalent_thickness_at_stp_of_atmosphere_ozone_content, so the wording will 
need to be tweaked):

"N.B. Data variables containing column content of ozone can be given the 
standard name of either equivalent_thickness_at_stp_of_atmosphere_ozone_content 
or atmosphere_mole_content_of_ozone.The latter name is recommended for 
consistency with mole content names for chemical species other than ozone."

Although this shouldn't affect the current proposal, I note for the record that 
it seems strange that for the Integral of the whole atmosphere our pattern is:

atmosphere_X_content

But for a partial integral we put 'atmosphere' after X:

X_content_of_atmosphere_layer

Best wishes,

      Philip

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Philip Cameron-Smith, [email protected], Lawrence Livermore National Lab.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



> -----Original Message-----
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 6:30 AM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard name for ozone partial column in
> atmosphere layer
> 
> Dear Christophe,
> 
> Thank you for proposing this name. I think
> mole_content_of_ozone_in_atmosphere_layer  is  the correct name and it is
> consistent with existing names such as
> mass_content_of_water_in_atmosphere_layer. The canonical units would be
> mol m-2 as for the total column name.  Regarding your suggested definition, I
> think we could delete the third sentence:
> "mole_content_of_X_in_atmosphere_layer" means the vertically integrated
> number of moles of X above a unit area" as it is essentially repeating the
> information contained in the previous two sentences, but otherwise it looks
> fine.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Alison
> 
> ------
> Alison Pamment                          Tel: +44 1235 778065
> NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre    Email: [email protected]
> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
> R25, 2.22
> Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CF-metadata [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> > Of Christophe Lerot
> > Sent: 22 January 2013 09:35
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: Jacob van Peet
> > Subject: [CF-metadata] standard name for ozone partial column in
> > atmosphere layer
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Similarly to what has been done for total ozone columns, some
> > colleagues of mine would need a standard name for ozone partial
> > columns in defined layers of the atmosphere.
> >
> > Therefore, I'd like to propose such a standard name based on the one
> > corresponding to total ozone
> >
> > "mole_content_of_ozone_in_atmosphere_layer":
> > "Content" indicates a quantity per unit area. The
> > "content_of_X_in_atmosphere_layer" refers to the vertical integral
> > between two specified levels in the atmosphere.
> > "mole_content_of_X_in_atmosphere_layer" means the vertically
> > integrated number of moles of X above a unit area.  "Layer" means any
> > layer with upper and lower boundaries that have constant values in
> > some vertical coordinate. There must be a vertical coordinate variable
> > indicating the extent of the layer(s). If the layers are model layers,
> > the vertical coordinate can be model_level_number, but it is
> > recommended to specify a physical coordinate (in a scalar or auxiliary
> > coordinate variable) as well. For the mole content integrated from the
> > surface to the top of the atmosphere, standard names including
> "atmosphere_mole_content_of_X"
> > are
> > used. The chemical formula for ozone is O3.
> > "mole_content_of_ozone_in_atmosphere_layer" is usually measured in
> > Dobson Units which are equivalent to 446.2 micromoles m-2.
> >
> > Thank you for considering this.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Christophe
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Dr. Christophe LEROT
> > Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
> > Chemistry & Physics of Atmospheres
> > Avenue circulaire, 3
> > 1180 Brussels
> > Belgium
> > phone:  +32/(0)2-3730-407
> > mobile: +32/(0)472-81.87.00
> > mail:   [email protected]
> > url:    http://uv-vis.aeronomie.be/
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> --
> Scanned by iCritical.
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to