I'm currently working with a group looking at profiling glider date a files 
from multiple countries. We've identified a similar need to differentiate qc 
tests on a per variable basis. I support the idea and the problem and I suppose 
one solution is the conventions attribute. 

Regards, 
Derrick

"Lowry, Roy K." <[email protected]> wrote:

>Dear All,
>
>Currently, the 'Conventions' attribute is restricted to be a global
>attribute.  There is currently a requirement to label multiple QC flag
>variables following different conventions with their source convention
>and having the 'Conventions' attribute as a variable attribute for
>these non-co-ordinate variables would seem a convenient and consistent
>mechanism.  Is there any support for or objections to this suggestion?
>
>Cheers, Roy.
>
>Please note that I now work part-time from Tuesday to Thursday.  E-mail
>response on other days is possible but not guaranteed!
>
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is
>subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this
>email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is
>exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be
>stored in an electronic records management system.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>CF-metadata mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to