Aleksandar, I support the standard name proposal for datetime_iso8601. However, I see several areas needing refinement, evidenced by today's messages. Would you like to start a trac ticket for further discussion? If you prefer, I can post my particular concerns on the CF main list.
--Dave On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Aleksandar Jelenak - NOAA Affiliate <[email protected]> wrote: > I fully support John Caron's proposal of having ISO 8601 datetime > strings as another way for encoding time data. But I proposed a > standard name so would like to return to that. > > From a few replies so far it seems that many interpret this standard > name proposal as a fundamental change of the convention. I don't see > it that way. My intention was to enhance the interoperability for such > data by specifying a limited subset of ISO8601 datetime string > formats. Note that having such variables does not break the convention > as long as they are not coordinate variables. > > Can I have the final decision, please? > > -Aleksandar _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
