Hi Aleksandar,
I don't think anyone has responded to your email below, so I am responding, in
part, so it doesn't get lost in the recent blizzard of emails on other topics
:-).
I still much prefer the alternative that was proposed:
time_sample_interval_due_to_collocation
I think this is less ambiguous, will be easier to understand for someone who
doesn't know what you are trying to represent, and easier to generalize in the
future.
I suggest that we tweak the description to improve clarity:
"The difference in time between two events that are collocated. Two events are
deemed to be collocated based on some set of spatial, temporal, and viewing
geometry criteria."
I also checked on the spelling of 'collocation'. Unfortunately, different
dictionaries seem to disagree, with varying support given to: collocation,
colocation, and co-location. In the dictionaries I looked at, collocation was
often described as a literary term (for two words appearing next to each
other), with colocation and co-location often being more clearly defined in the
way that we want. But it was not clear cut. Is there consensus in the fields
relevant to CF?
Best wishes,
Philip
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Philip Cameron-Smith, [email protected], Lawrence Livermore National Lab.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: CF-metadata [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Aleksandar Jelenak - NOAA Affiliate
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New Standard Names for Satellite Data
Does anyone wants to comment further on the standard name below? It's been
almost three weeks since I provided the definition.
Standard name: collocation_time_interval
Definition:
The temporal difference between two measurement events being collocated.
Collocation is a process in remote sensing of grouping two independent
measurements based on a set of spatial, temporal, and viewing geometry criteria.
Units: s
-Aleksandar
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Aleksandar Jelenak - NOAA Affiliate
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Cameron-smith, Philip
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi, Edward,
>>
>> _sample_ seems a good alternative.
>>
>> I still like the idea of _due_to_collocation, since that defines what the
>> interval is about. So how about the following?
>>
>> time_sample_interval_due_to_collocation
>>
>> Philip
>
> Philip, Ed --
>
> I apologize for the delay in my reply. It is time to wrap up this discussion.
>
> I really like the name "collocation_time_interval" but if that is not
> to be my second choice is "time_sample_interval_due_to_collocation".
>
> Here's the definition I propose:
>
> "
> The temporal difference between two measurement events being
> collocated. Collocation is a process in remote sensing of grouping two
> independent measurements based on a set of spatial, temporal, and
> viewing geometry criteria.
> "
>
> -Aleksandar
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
