+1 for Roy's choice. Can you explain the following for the acoustically naive? "I assume the data would need some additional description to denote the vertical extent of the measurement, such as cell_bounds and cell_methods='Z:sum'."
John On May 30, 2013, at 06:45, "Lowry, Roy K." <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear All, > > Of Matthias's suggestions I have a strong preference for a slight extension > of roundtrip_acoustic_travel_time_in_sea_water, namely > acoustic_signal_roundtrip_travel_time_in_sea_water. 'two-way' is a possible > alternative to 'roundtrip' but I think the former carries unfortunate seismic > semantic implications, so 'roundtrip' is better for IES. Including > 'in_sea_water' is also essential to clearly distinguish it from seismic data. > > Cheers, Roy. > ________________________________________ > From: CF-metadata [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthias > Lankhorst [[email protected]] > Sent: 30 May 2013 13:16 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [CF-metadata] standard_name for acoustic travel time from echo > sounder > > Dear CF, > > I have oceanographic data from IES instruments (inverted echo sounder) that I > would like to publish via OceanSITES in a CF-compliant form. The data in > question are acoustic travel times from the echo sounding device. This means > the time it took for the acoustic signal to run from the instrument (which > sits on the seafloor) to the sea surface and back to the instrument. These > data are commonly used as a proxy for ocean heat content. > > I don't think there is a suitable CF standard_name out there, and ask for your > help in finding/creating one. Which of the following sound good? > > acoustic_travel_time > vertical_acoustic_travel_time > roundtrip_acoustic_travel_time_in_sea_water > echo_sounder_acoustic_travel_time > > ...I could think of a couple more combinations using the words above, but > would like to hear other people's opinions. > > The canonical units would obviously be seconds. > > I assume the data would need some additional description to denote the > vertical extent of the measurement, such as cell_bounds and > cell_methods='Z:sum'. > > Any comments? > > Kind regards, Matthias > > > -- > _______________________________________ > > Dr. Matthias Lankhorst > Scripps Institution of Oceanography > 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0230 > La Jolla, CA 92093-0230 > USA > > Phone: +1 858 822 5013 > Fax: +1 858 534 9820 > E-Mail: [email protected] > http://www-pord.ucsd.edu/~mlankhorst/ > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata > > This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject > to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any > reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release > under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic > records management system. > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata > --------------- John Graybeal Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org [email protected] _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
