Hello Jonathan (W), As far as the four sea surface temperature standard names go, they refer to the temperature of different thicknesses at the top of the water column. Roughly speaking these are:
sea_surface_temperature - top 10-20m sea_surface_foundation_temperature - top 1-5m sea_surface_subskin_temperature - top couple of mm sea_surface_skin_temperature - top 10-20 microns I think your confusion may be caused by what I think is an error in the definition of sea_surface_temperature, which currently states 'and not the skin temperature, whose standard name is surface_temperature'. This should surely read 'and not the skin temperature, whose standard name is surface_skin_temperature'. My understanding of air-sea interface temperature is that it is the temperature of thin layers of air and water that are in physical contact. I would expect these to be numerically equal and correspond to the Standard Names 'sea_surface_skin_temperature' and 'surface_temperature_where_open_sea'. Hope this helps. Cheers, Roy. From: CF-metadata [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Wrotny [[email protected]] Sent: 13 June 2013 18:04 To: Jonathan Gregory Cc: [email protected] List; Karl Taylor Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] new standard name: land_surface_skin_temperature Dear Jonathan Gregory, A few days ago, I submitted a proposal for a new standard name, land_surface_skin_temperature. This name would essentially be the land analogue for the "sea_surface_skin_temperature" standard name. However, through some of the dialogue on the CF mailing list re: this submission, a few related questions have arose: 1) What is meaning of the "surface_temperature" standard name? The definition states that it is the temperature of the interface, and not the medium above or below. What does this mean? There has be some medium to have a temperature. 2) The "sea_surface_temperature" definition seems to incorrectly refer to the "surface_temperature", when it should refer instead to the "sea_surface_skin_temperature." But, I can't say this for sure in light of question #1. 3) Karl Taylor has raised the question that if someone searches for surface temperature, this is the same as the skin temperature. So, there could be some ambiguity between the surface temperature and surface skin temperature names in CF, which may or may not be intended. 4) After question #1-3 are determined, this should presumably make it easier to determine the role of the proposed "land_surface_skin_temperature" name. Sorry to put so many questions in one post, but it seemed like my latest post generated several questions, and I thought putting them all in one place might make things a little less confusing. Thanks in advance for your feedback. Sincerely, Jonathan Wrotny On 6/10/2013 12:54 PM, Jonathan Wrotny wrote: Jim, This is a good question and you raise a good point. I have to admit that I too am a little confused by the definition of "surface temperature" in the CF database. My initial interpretation was that this quantity refers to the temperature at the lowest level of the atmosphere, i.e. just above the surface, so that it is actually an air temperature. But, how can the "surface temperature" be an air temperature (or a skin temperature, for that matter) if it is "not the bulk temperature of the medium above or below (the interface)"? Could someone help please clarify the "surface temperature" quantity? Jonathan Wrotny On 6/10/2013 12:30 PM, Jim Biard wrote: I'd appreciate it if someone would take the time to help an ignorant soul understand how a non-physical boundary such as the interface between the land surface and the atmosphere can have a temperature. It sure seems to me that you need some material in order to have a temperature, and such an interface seems to have none. Jim Biard Research Scholar Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites Remote Sensing and Applications Division National Climatic Data Center 151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801-5001 [email protected] 828-271-4900 Follow us on Facebook! On Jun 10, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Jonathan Wrotny <[email protected]> wrote: Dear Jonathan Gregory, I have not yet replied to this e-mail yet from you...thanks for the information on the meaning of the various surface temperatures. Yes, the land skin temperature is actually different from the "surface_temperature" standard name since it corresponds to the skin, and not the interface, temperature. So, I do believe that an additional name will need to be added to account for this land analogue to "sea_surface_skin_temperature." Here is my current proposal: Standard Name: land_surface_skin_temperature Definition: The surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. The land surface skin temperature is the temperature measured by an infrared radiometer, but measurements from microwave radiometers operating at GHz wavelengths also exist. It represents the aggregate temperature of the skin surface where “skin” means the surface medium viewed by a sensor to a vertical depth of approximately 12 micrometers. Measurements of this quantity are subject to a large potential diurnal cycle which is primarily due to the balance between heating during the day by solar radiation and continual cooling from terrestrial (long-wave) radiation emitted by the skin surface. Canonical Units: K Sincerely, Jonathan On 6/7/2013 3:47 AM, Jonathan Gregory wrote: Dear Jonathan W If my interpretation of all of the surface temperature names is correct, then there may need to be a modification to the current definition of "sea_surface_temperature." In particular, this definition states "It is the temperature of sea water near the surface (including the part under sea-ice, if any), and not the skin temperature, whose standard name is surface_temperature." However, it seems to me that the "surface_temperature" is the atmosphere/medium interface temperature, and not the temperature of the medium below the interface (e.g. the skin temperature). So, I'm wondering if the above sentence in quotes incorrectly refers to the "surface_temperature" when perhaps it should refer to the "sea_surface_skin_temperature"? Yes, I think you are right. This definition of sea_surface_temperature may predate the introduction of sea_surface_skin_temperature. The SST is neither the true interface temperature (for which the name is surface_temperature) nor the "skin" temperature, but a bulk temperature applying to a rather ill-defined upper layer of the ocean. There isn't a land analogue for SST. If land skin temperature is different from surface_temperature of the interface, a new name is needed for it, I agree. Cheers Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
<<attachment: ATT00001.png>>
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
