Mark,

While there is a close relationship between NERC and CF, they are not the only 
two mechanisms publishing CF terms.  The MMI vocabulary server, 
http://mmisw.org/orr, also publishes CF standard name vocabulary and term URIs.

The URI for the entire vocabulary is http://mmisw.org/ont/cf/parameter, or if 
you want specifically the version 23 vocabulary, 
http://mmisw.org/ont/cf/20130603T200127/parameter.  It does not have the CF 
namespace directly; however, we have mechanisms by which we could alias terms 
to/from a CF namespace.  (Your sub-domain suggestion is a good one for CF.)

Each standard name also exists in MMI as an individual resource, for example 
http://mmisw.org/ont/cf/parameter/air_temperature (or in versioned form, 
http://mmisw.org/ont/cf/20130603T200127/parameter/air_temperature).  

Many of your querying and resolution proposals are already satisfied with this 
service. The vocabularies can be published in multiple forms; SPAQRL queries 
are supported (e.g., http://mmisw.org/ont/?form=json&sparql=SELECT ?s ?p ?o 
WHERE {?s ?p ?o. } LIMIT 20), where the output form is specified as json, csv, 
or html (see examples page at http://mmisw.org/ont/sparql.html); and while I 
haven't constructed a query by vocabulary lately, given a few moments this 
weekend I will steal/demonstrate examples in that category.

Please consider the MMI server for your existing needs, and perhaps they are a 
good fit for long-term CF goals as well.

John





On Jun 13, 2013, at 09:14, "Hedley, Mark" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you for the reminder Roy, I should have posted this a while back 
> 
> I have written a paper on publishing standard names which I think might 
> provide some of the required functionality for the community.
> 
> It would be very useful for me and work I am involved in.
> 
> The paper is attached.  I invite feedback on this proposal
> 
> many thanks
> mark
> 
> 
> 
> From: CF-metadata [[email protected]] on behalf of Lowry, Roy 
> K. [[email protected]]
> Sent: 13 June 2013 14:50
> To: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute
> 
> Hello Ajay,
>  
> If I've got it right, your example is a URL for a single standard name.  The 
> version numbers refer to versions of the whole list and so including the 
> version number in a reference to a single standard name causes the standard 
> name to inherit the version number of the list of which it is a member.  
> Trouble is that most standard names are members of more than one list version 
> but the standard name is exactly the same in each of these versions.  
> Consequently, a given standard name ends up with multiple URIs.  In version 1 
> of the vocabulary server we run (NERC Vocabulary Server or NVS) we made the 
> mistake of list members inheriting the version numbers of their parent lists 
> and learned the hard way the problems it causes for operational systems.  
> Versioning in the current version of NVS (V2)has been done differently with 
> list member and list versioning totally decoupled and the versioning 
> information explicitly excluded from list member URIs.
>  
> I am aware of work underway by Mark Hedley at the UK Met Office to provide 
> URLs for Standard Names in a CF namespace that follow linked data principles 
> by resolving into usable XML (SKOS RDF) documents.  I'm not sure how far this 
> work has progressed, so I'll leave it Mark to say more on the list if he 
> feels he's ready.
>  
> Cheers, Roy.
>  
> 
> 
> From: CF-metadata [[email protected]] on behalf of Ajay 
> Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate [[email protected]]
> Sent: 13 June 2013 13:44
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [CF-metadata] standard_name_vocabulary attribute
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> There seems to be some ambiguity about the usage of the 
> standard_name_vocabulary attribute. Based on the link below, the right value 
> would be to use something like CF 1.6 
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/formats/DataDiscoveryAttConvention.html#standard_name_vocabulary_Attribute
> 
> Is that the right usage or should we reference the version of the 
> cf-standard-name-table like v1..v23 etc.?
> 
> Any info on this would be much appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ajay
> <publishingStandardNames.pdf>_______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


---------------
John Graybeal
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org
[email protected]




_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to