Dear Randy

> The GOES-R ground system generates level 2+ products such as aerosol optical 
> depth, for the hemispheric, continental US, and mesocale (100 km x 1000 km) 
> regions.
> 
> The NetCDF product files need to contain statistics (min, max, mean, and 
> standard deviation) associated with ALL the gridded data associated with a 
> region.
> 
> It would seem the use of cell methods to express these statistics in the 
> product file makes sense even though there is only one cell (i.e. the one 
> cell that captures the statistic for the entire region).

Yes, I agree.

> It is stated in the first sentence of CF standard para. 7.3.3 that the 
> statistical method is evaluated over the entire horizontal area of the cell.  
> In the case of our level 2+ products, this is not always the case, so we have 
> a need to somehow express that the statistic is associated with a subset of 
> the cell.
> 
> For example, in the case of the Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) product, the 
> algorithm that generates the gridded data is has solar zenith angle and 
> platform zenith angle constraints.
> 
> Essentially, these statistics apply to a portion of the single cell.  
> Unfortunately, the "where <area_type>" features discussed in CF standard 
> para. 7.3.3 do not work for us because the AOD product constraints are 
> associated with the solar zenith angle and platform zenith angle at the time 
> of observation, not one of the area_types.
> 
> Given the currently available cell method constructs, which allow for 
> capturing the original spacing of the gridded data elements and the ability 
> to include non-standardized information, we have applied the existing CF 
> cell_method constructs as follow:
> 
> float minimum_AOD_for_region ;
> 
>    coordinates = "solar_zenith_angle  platform_zenith_angle  time  y  x" ;
> 
>    cell_methods = "time: sum  area: sum (interval: 2 km  
> comment:solar_zenith_angle and platform_zenith_angle conforming pixels only)" 
> ;
> 
> Is the way we are applying cell methods consistent with the CF standard ?

Yes, I think that is fine, if it's OK for you to use non-standardised
information. This sort of application was the intention of the standard.

Is "sum" really the right cell_method? I would have expected "mean".

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to