Dear Randy > In the case of the GOES-R derived motion winds product, the error estimate > (i.e. more formally referred to as Expected Error) is based on a custom > algorithm.
Thanks for the further information about this. I see the point of the quantity but I am unclear how it is used quantitatively. Knowing this might help clarify how it should be described. In particular, once it has been derived, is it used as if it were the standard deviation of the derived value? If so, it would be appropriate to call it a standard error. If not, what interpretation is given to it, regarding the statistics of the derived value? Best wishes Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
