Dear all,
maybe we should rephrase the question behind this discussion: How can
hierarchies and/or groups be implemented without breaking CF? More
specifically, it seems that we should care about not breaking CF when the
suitcases are packed or unpacked. It would be a nightmare if anyone or any
interoperable application would have to re-build CF compliance every time the
hierarchies are introduced or flattened out. Unless I am mistaken here this
would mean that CF should be "group aware" without necessarily having to
support hierarchies or groups as a concept. Would this be a compromise to work
on?
Cheers,
Martin
> Thus far all that have been put on display seem to be counter-examples(*):
> [...]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Das Forschungszentrum oeffnet seine Tueren am Sonntag, 29. September, von 10:00
bis 17:00 Uhr: http://www.tagderneugier.de
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata