Dear Steve et al. > I support the idea that the term "ensemble" be allowed (by whatever > machinery) as an alias for "realization".
It'd be fine to have an standard_name alias, I agree, but I think it should be "ensemble_member", not "ensemble". The ensemble is the collection of members (aka realizations). > axis="E" also seems like an appropriate step to maintain consistency > with other well known axis types, given the high likelihood that > ensemble axes will become commonplace in the future. That would require a change to the convention to be proposed on a trac ticket by someone. Best wishes Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
