Hello Randy, That's good news.
I can see no reason for it not to be in 1.7, as it was accepted ~1.5 years ago, but I'm not sure of the mechanisms behind this process ... can someone advise? Many thanks and all the best, David ---- Original message from rho...@excaliburlabs.com (04AM 20 Dec 13) > From: "rho...@excaliburlabs.com" <rho...@excaliburlabs.com> > To: David Hassell <d.c.hass...@reading.ac.uk> > CC: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu> > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] one data variable is associated with two grid > mappings > Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 04:42:04 -0500 > > Dear David: > > Yes, that will work. Thanks for pointing that out to me. > > Is this enhancement going to make it into 1.7 ? I took a look at the 1.7 > draft, and it is not in there yet. > > very respectfully, > > randy > > ---------------------------------------- > From: "David Hassell" <d.c.hass...@reading.ac.uk> > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 4:17 AM > To: "Randy Horne" <rho...@excaliburlabs.com> > Cc: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu> > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] one data variable is associated with two grid > mappings > > Dear Randy, > > Will the method accepted in ticket 70 > (https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/70) work for you? > > "The expanded form of the grid_mapping attribute is required if one > wants to store coordinate information for more than one coordinate > reference system" > > Something like this, perhaps: > > float data_var > data_var:grid_mapping = "latitude-longitude: <associated coordinates> > geostationary: <associated coordinates>" > > char latitude-longitude // grid mapping > > char geostationary // grid mapping > > All the best, > > David > > ---- Original message from Randy Horne (09PM 19 Dec 13) > > > From: Randy Horne <rho...@excaliburlabs.com> > > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:26:20 -0500 > > To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu> > > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) > > Subject: [CF-metadata] one data variable is associated with two grid > > mappings > > > > Folks: > > > > We have a product with a data variable containing 10 degree latitude band > statistics (i.e. min, max) derived from observation data whose east/west > extents are associated with the field of view of a geostationary satellite > (i.e. the recently defined geostationary grid mapping / projection). > > > > The implication is that this data variable is associated with two > different grid mappings (latitude-longitude & geostationary). Workarounds > to represent the east/west grid boundaries on the latitude-longitude grid > mapping are unappealing due to the different geometries associated with the > two projections. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > very respectfully, > > > > randy > > _______________________________________________ > > CF-metadata mailing list > > CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata > > -- > David Hassell > National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS) > Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, > Earley Gate, PO Box 243, > Reading RG6 6BB, U.K. > > Tel : +44 118 3785613 > E-mail: d.c.hass...@reading.ac.uk > > -- David Hassell National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS) Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 243, Reading RG6 6BB, U.K. Tel : +44 118 3785613 E-mail: d.c.hass...@reading.ac.uk _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
