Hi Karl:

In the application I am working, the notion of these values being distributions 
is secondary.  Some of our products do not include all three of these (i.e. 
day, night, twilight).  For example we have a gridded data product that has 
valid data only for the area within the product’s region that is daytime.

very respectfully,

randy

On Jan 3, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Karl Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I don't find "area_fraction_of_solar_zenith_angle" to be understandable and 
> I'm not sure the phrase makes sense.  I don't see how you can have an "area 
> of a solar zenith angle" (or an area_fraction of an angle).  One could also 
> be misled into thinking this was somehow related to the solid angle 
> associated with a cone defined by the zenith angle.
> 
> Perhaps some other variant on the earlier suggestions would be better.  
> (either 3 names, or something related to "distributions" ... afterall the 
> quantity is calculated by considering the normalized histogram of pixels (of 
> equal area) placed in 3 different bins: day, night, and "twilight").
> 
> best regards,
> Karl
> 
> On 1/3/14 12:33 PM, Randy Horne wrote:
>> Dear Jonathan:
>> 
>> RE:
>>> The first sentence is not clear to me. Does it mean, "The fraction of the
>>> horizontal area where the solar zenith angle is within a specified range"?
>> 
>> Yes, that is what it means.
>> 
>> Incorporating this more clear statement yields the following:
>> 
>> area_fraction_of_solar_zenith_angle
>> 
>> definition:
>> The fraction of the horizontal area where the solar zenith angle is within a 
>> specified range. A coordinate variable of solar_zenith_angle with boundaries 
>> indicating the range must be specified.
>> 
>> very respectfully,
>> 
>> randy
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 3, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Jonathan Gregory <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Randy
>>> 
>>>> a single standard name of area_fraction_of_solar_zenith_angle is fine.  
>>>> This form could be useful for area fractions of other angles, such as 
>>>> platform zenith angle.
>>> Yes, true. If you're happy with it, then fine.
>>> 
>>>> As far as a definition goes, how about:
>>>> fraction of horizontal area resulting from the projection of the solar 
>>>> zenith angle. A
>>>> coordinate variable of solar_zenith_angle with boundaries indicating the 
>>>> angular extent must be specified.    
>>> The first sentence is not clear to me. Does it mean, "The fraction of the
>>> horizontal area where the solar zenith angle is within a specified range"?
>>> 
>>> An advantage of this more general quantity is that you could contain day,
>>> night, twilight and any other such fraction in a single data variable, if
>>> you wanted to, by having a dimension of size more than one for the solar
>>> zenith angle.
>>> 
>>> Best wishes
>>> 
>>> Jonathan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CF-metadata mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>> 
>> ____________________________________
>> 
>> Randy C. Horne ([email protected])
>> Principal Engineer, Excalibur Laboratories Inc.
>> voice & fax: (321) 952.5100
>> url: http://www.excaliburlabs.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CF-metadata mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


____________________________________

Randy C. Horne ([email protected])
Principal Engineer, Excalibur Laboratories Inc.
voice & fax: (321) 952.5100
url: http://www.excaliburlabs.com




_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to