On Feb 12, 2014, at 21:31, Charlie Zender <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that the name should encode the method if the result is sensitive to
> the method.
Here there be dragons. Can it be said that this is not a different measurement
of the same thing, but a measurement of a different property?
If you go this route, a perhaps clearer option for the name is suggested by an
existing pattern:
height_at_cloud_top_defined_by_infrared_radiation (or _infrared_reflection,
or something similar)
This has the added benefit that it puts the emphasis on what is being measured,
rather than the act of measuring ('retrieval').
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
