Dear All:

we requested the cloud mask and related quantities last year, and I had the 
impression these standard_names were accepted. 


cloud_binary_mask: X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 elsewhere. 1 
= cloud present, 0 = cloud absent (clear). Note that if no threshold is 
supplied, the binary mask is 1 if there is any non-zero amount of cloud


aerosol_binary_mask: X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 elsewhere. 
1 = aerosols present, 0 = aerosolsabsent.  Note that if no threshold is 
supplied, the binary mask is 1 if there is any non-zero amount of aerosol.


smoke_binary_mask: X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 elsewhere. 1 
= smoke present, 0 = smoke absent. Note that if no  threshold is supplied, the 
binary mask is 1 if there is any non-zero amount of smoke.


dust_binary_mask: X_binary_mask has 1 where condition X is met, 0 elsewhere. 1 
= dust present, 0 = dust absent. Note that if no threshold is supplied, the 
binary mask is 1 if there is any non-zero amount of dust.



I asked Alison in December about why these had not made it into the CF standard 
name table, and she said it was on her queue..


The specific thread starts at:  
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2013/056483.html


very respectfully,

randy




On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Gregory <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Dear Kris
> 
> cloud_binary_mask would be exactly the right standard name, I think, as Jim
> suggests.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Jonathan
> 
>> We are detecting cloudy and clear sky pixels using a combination passive 
>> infrared and visible satellite imagery.  The community typically calls this 
>> product a "cloud mask", i.e. byte value 0=clear sky pixel, 1=cloudy pixel.  
>> I am reviewing the CF Standard Name table and I see no name that would 
>> correspond to this type of product.  I see the name "cloud_area_fraction", 
>> but the concept of "fraction" would imply that one considers several pixels 
>> in a region and computes the ratio of cloudy pixels relative to the total 
>> number of pixels in the region.   This is not being done with our 
>> processing.  I'd recommend something like 
>> "cloudy_satellite_pixel_detection", but am open to other suggestions
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


____________________________________

Randy C. Horne ([email protected])
Principal Engineer, Excalibur Laboratories Inc.
voice & fax: (321) 952.5100
url: http://www.excaliburlabs.com





_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to