Jim:

Our two GOES-R products that are height quantities are geopotential heights - 
(1) the quantity for which the standard_name is being requested now 
(geopotential_height_at_cloud_top) and (2) the height of volcanic ash clouds 
for which we got a standard name added last year 
(geopotential_height_at_volcanic_ash_cloud_top).

These heights are measured from mean sea level (represented with constant 
gravity).

very respectfully,

randy


On Feb 14, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Jim Biard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Randy,
> 
> Is the geopotential height zero at the geoid?  (You are unfortunate to 
> propose this while antennae are twitching over verticality!  Please forgive 
> me.)  I hadn’t realized before this that we have some rather specific (and 
> somewhat erroneous) definitions for height and altitude in the standard name 
> table.  I see that the verbiage you have in your definition is common to a 
> number of other names, so I guess it’s OK until we get some things 
> straightened out (if we ever do!).
> 
> Grace and peace,
> 
> Jim
> 
> Visit us on
> Facebook      Jim Biard
> Research Scholar
> Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC
> North Carolina State University
> NOAA's National Climatic Data Center
> 151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
> e: [email protected]
> o: +1 828 271 4900
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 12, 2014, at 4:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>> Dear All:
>> 
>> I would like to propose a new standard name:
>> geopotential_height_at_cloud_top
>> 
>> definition:
>> Cloud_top refers to the top of the highest cloud. Geopotential is the sum of 
>> the specific gravitational potential energy relative to the geoid and the 
>> specific centripetal potential energy. Geopotential height is the 
>> geopotential divided by the standard acceleration due to gravity. It is 
>> numerically similar to the altitude (or geometric height) and not to the 
>> quantity with standard name "height", which is relative to the surface.
>> 
>> canonical units:
>> m
>> 
>> 
>> The timing of this proposal, and its relationship to the currently on-going 
>> vertical datums discussion, is purely coincidental.
>> 
>> very respectfully,
>> 
>> randy
>> _______________________________________________
>> CF-metadata mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> 


____________________________________

Randy C. Horne ([email protected])
Principal Engineer, Excalibur Laboratories Inc.
voice & fax: (321) 952.5100
url: http://www.excaliburlabs.com




_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to