Dear all,
Hello again! About two months back I sent in a request, which is referenced 
below, in which I requested that we add the 
‘normalized_radar_backscatter_coefficient’ in CF. Having heard nothing to the 
contrary, and seeing as no other standards name match our needs, we at PO.DAAC 
will be moving forward in implementing this new standard name.

As our newly reprocessed netCDF datasets shall soon serve as an online 
replacement for existing datasets already in use by hundreds of 
interdisciplinary scatterometry data users, we hope to likewise hear back from 
you soon as to whether there is consensus on our proposed standard name. If 
there is anything further we can do to build community consensus on our 
proposed standard name, please let me know.

Sincerely,
John

--
John Niedfeldt
Data Engineering
PO.DAAC, JPL

From: Lauret Olivier <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, May 30, 2014 at 8:11 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: JPL <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: TR: normalized_radar_backscatter_coefficient

Hi all,

Just forwarding you some discussion we have with J. Niedfeldt about some 
standard name for sigma naught variable. I thought the available 
“surface_backwards_scattering_coefficient_of_radar_wave” could be used 
considering some changes in the definition [in short I wish we could mix the 
description of sigma naught from radar altimetry with the one from 
scatterometers]. But it seems that the quantities are different enough to 
introduce a new standard name (see the message below).

Can we introduce  ‘normalized_radar_backscatter_coefficient’ in CF?

Thanks,

Olivier

De : Niedfeldt, John C (398M-Affiliate) [mailto:[email protected]]
Envoyé : jeudi 29 mai 2014 21:26
À : Lauret Olivier
Objet : normalized_radar_backscatter_coefficient

Dear Mr. Olivier,
After discussion  with Dr. David Long of BYU and reviewing the current 
definition with him it was determined that we do in fact need a new variable. 
In microwave remote sensing the normalized radar cross section, sigma naught, 
is always produced from one angle of incidence and from one wavelength. I 
understand the desire to consolidate the number of standard names and to not 
have duplication, but adding this standard name would reduce confusion and 
error for many I believe. It is also general enough that we can add attributes 
to it in the future to allow further specification for various endeavors. If 
you have any more questions feel free to contact me and thank you again for 
your assistance. We changed the standard_name to be more descriptive.

standard_name:
normalized_radar_backscatter_coefficient

Definition:
normalized_radar_backscatter_coefficient is also called the normalized radar 
cross section, which are commonly used in the microwave remote sensing 
community.

Canonical Units:
1


Sincerely,
John Niedfeldt


Cliquez 
ici<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/2LOsaOXZrhvGX2PQPOmvUv46NwAC7+vkC1iVvWwtaJsvPofrofBkzx9EQlOBYQCJLRpx1D!2lTb1VsBVsOva5A==>
 si ce message est indésirable (pourriel).
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to