Hi Karl,

This ticket has been created as http://kitt.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/116, I added 
your comment there and responded.

John


On Jul 25, 2014, at 11:56, Karl Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> An alternative would be to replace them with the names used for CMIP5 (see  
> http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/docs/standard_output.xls ). We'd have to 
> find a volunteer to do that.  In any case it wouldn't hurt to open a ticket, 
> I suppose.  
> 
> Karl
> 
> On 7/10/14, 3:46 PM, John Graybeal wrote:
>> Reviewing the CF list for the FAQ, I found this quote about AMIP and PCMDI 
>> in the standard name table:
>> At 8:37 AM +0100 4/10/08, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
>> > As I mentioned, for these reasons I think we should remove the AMIP and 
>> > PCMDI equivalences from the table. In any case, they are not being 
>> > maintained and are out of date, and probably wrong for some GRIB codes.
>> It appears they have not been removed as of v27, and I can find no further 
>> mention of them in either the mail archives or the trac system. 
>> 
>> Jonathan and all, should I make a trac ticket to remove them?
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------
>> John Graybeal
>> [email protected]
>> 650-450-1853
>> skype: graybealski
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CF-metadata mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to