Hi, Another question relating to our work on migrating gridded UK observations data to NetCDF...
We have several variables that we describe loosely as 'days of rain'. Strictly speaking they are a count (e.g. for a calendar month) of the number of days when the 24-hour precipitation total was greater than or equal to a threshold. We currently generate grids for three thresholds - 0.2mm, 1.0mm and 10.0mm. My intention is to use the following existing standard name: number_of_days_with_lwe_thickness_of_precipitation_amount_above_threshold My only slight problem is that the definition implies 'greater than' whereas our variables are 'greater than or equal to' the threshold. Assuming the observations have a precision of 0.1 mm (which is true for the UK) I could declare the thresholds to be 0.1mm, 0.9mm and 9.9mm respectively. Alternatively, to avoid the assumption about precision I could use 0.19999mm, 0.99999mm and 9.99999mm. Neither option seems very elegant or satisfactory. To define new standard name(s) seems over the top. What advice would others give? Is there a way to adapt the existing threshold variables (there are currently 8, relating to air temperature, precipitation and wind speed) to cope with both 'greater/less than' and 'greater/less than or equal to', or should I just use one of my solutions given above? Thanks, Dan PS I appreciate this topic may have been discussed before, however I can't seem to find a way to search the mailing list archives. Is this possible and if so how? Thanks. Dan Hollis Climatologist Met Office Hadley Centre FitzRoy Road Exeter Devon EX1 3PB United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)1392 886780 Fax: +44 (0)1392 885681 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk For UK climate and past weather information, visit http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
