Dear John and Nan

Thanks for your contributions. I agree that the final phrase from_saturation
is a bit awkward; I couldn't think of a better place for it, but John's
pointing out the use of "deficit" elsewhere is useful. That also raises the
question of the sign of the difference. I think "difference of A from B"
means A-B (not B-A) but it maybe that wasn't what Ajay meant, and it should
be clear, which could be done with "signed" words.

Also, I omitted "moles" by accident - sorry!

Here's a new suggestion, a compound of John's and mine:
  excess_wrt_saturation_of_moles_of_oxygen_per_unit_mass_in_sea_water
or
  deficit_wrt_saturation_of_moles_of_oxygen_per_unit_mass_in_sea_water
depending on what the intended sign is.

Cheers

Jonathan

----- Forwarded message from John Graybeal <[email protected]> -----

> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:41:08 -0800
> From: John Graybeal <[email protected]>
> To: CF Metadata List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name:
>       apparent_oxygen_utilization
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
> 
> Three thoughts:  
> 
> (1) Other suggestions for the name: 
> oxygen_saturation_deficit_in_sea_water_per_unit_mass, or 
> oxygen_saturation_deficit_moles_per_unit_mass_in_sea_water. (Because the 
> following two look analogous: fractional_saturation_of_oxygen_in_sea_water 
> (being only in different units), and water_vapor_saturation_deficit_in_air; 
> and because might other base units also need to be differentiated?)
> 
> (2) If we really like the proposed construction, having 'from_saturation' as 
> the final phrase feels a bit off/hard to parse. I keep wanting to say from 
> saturation of what? Perhaps just ignorance of a non-scientist.
> 
> (3) (Just because we have not addressed this possibility explicitly.)  I can 
> imagine needing a term that really means apparent_oxygen_utilization, namely 
> comparing an observation where oxygen is being utilized (e.g, by an 
> organism), to a case where it is not. In which case, a definition presumably 
> could focus clearly on that difference.
> 
> John
> 
> ---------------
> John Graybeal
> Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org
> MMI Ontology Registry and Repository: http://mmisw.org/orr
> 
> 
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 10:02, Jonathan Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Ajay
> > 
> > I hadn't replied because I'm not an expert in this subject. On general 
> > grounds,
> > following the usual approach of CF standard names, I'd suggest that 
> > something
> > more self-explanatory would be better than apparent_oxygen_utilization. 
> > Given
> > your definition of what it means
> > 
> >>> definition: the difference between saturation oxygen content and observed
> >>> oxygen content.
> > 
> > what about
> >  difference_of_oxygen_per_unit_mass_in_sea_water_from_saturation
> > We have other standard names with "difference" in them, for example
> >  difference_of_air_pressure_from_model_reference
> > and we have quantities in mol kg-1, for instance
> >  moles_of_oxygen_per_unit_mass_in_sea_water
> > and I'm basing my suggestion on those.
> > 
> > The canonical unit for the standard name table should be mol kg-1, but you
> > could have micromol kg-1 as your units, since they're physically equivalent.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > Jonathan
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Forwarded message from Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate 
> > <[email protected]> -----
> > 
> >> From: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:54:17 -0500
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name:
> >>    apparent_oxygen_utilization
> >> 
> >> Hi All,
> >> 
> >> I had requested for a new standard name for apparent_oxygen_utilization
> >> during the last week of November. Since, there have been no discussions on
> >> it, I wanted to quickly
> >> follow up on it.
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ajay
> >> 
> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Dear CF community,
> >>> 
> >>> On behalf of NODC, I would like to request for a new standard name:
> >>> 
> >>> apparent_oxygen_utiliziation (AOU)
> >>> definition: the difference between saturation oxygen content and observed
> >>> oxygen content.
> >>> units: micromoles/kg
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Description is from Broecker and Peng, 1982, Tracers in
> >>> the Sea
> >>> http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~broecker/Home_files/
> >>> TracersInTheSea_searchable.pdf
> >>> (pp 131-138)
> >>> 
> >>> Some more detail in Garcia et al., World Ocean Atlas
> >>> Volume 3: Dissolved Oxygen, Apparent Oxygen Utilization, and
> >>> Oxygen Saturation.
> >>> http://data.nodc.noaa.gov/woa/WOA13/DOC/woa13_vol3.pdf
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ajay
> >>> 
> > 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CF-metadata mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> > 
> > 
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to