Hi Jonathan, Yes. In the LNOF frame convention, Y+=west.
Question: if these names are accepted here in the mailing list, what is the process into making them official part of the standard names? Kind regards, On vr, 2015-02-13 at 13:01 +0000, Jonathan Gregory wrote: > Dear Napoleon > > > In discussions within the science group behind > > our application, they suggest the following names: > > > > northward_northward_derivative_of_gravity_potential (Txx) > > westward_westward_derivative_of_gravity_potential (Tyy) > > upward_upward_derivative_of_gravity_potential (Tzz) > > northward_upward_derivative_of_gravity_potential (Txz) > > northward_westward_derivative_of_gravity_potential (Txy) > > westward_upward_derivative_of_gravity_potential (Tyz) > > > > Yes they are spatial derivatives of the potential in the specified > > directions, ending up with unit s-2; > > That scheme seems fine to me. Thanks. It hadn't occurred to me before, but > do you really mean westward, not eastward i.e. negative x-direction? > > Best wishes > > Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata -- -- N.E. Cornejo, Msc. Engineering, Space & Science http://www.stcorp.nl s[&]t
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
