Hi Alison, Just to clarify that I am in total agreement with this and had a bit of a senior moment in a previous message.
Cheers, Roy. ________________________________ From: Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate [[email protected]] Sent: 26 February 2015 14:56 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Request for new standard-name: apparent_oxygen_utilization Hi Alison, Yes, please use mol kg-1 as the canonical unit. Thanks, Ajay alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk<http://stfc.ac.uk> alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk <mailto:cf-metadata%40cgd.ucar.edu?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BCF-metadata%5D%20Request%20for%20new%0A%09standard-name%3A%09apparent_oxygen_utilization&In-Reply-To=%3C014539AC4976BE4490A360410A8C20178A2D6062%40EXCHMBX01.fed.cclrc.ac.uk%3E> Thu Feb 26 03:56:32 MST 2015 Dear All, Thank you for the constructive discussion of this proposal - it seems that agreement has been reached on apparent_oxygen_utilisation with canonical units of mol kg-1. (Just to double check: is this the correct unit for use with the World Ocean Database, which I believe is the reason for requesting the name in the first place. Units of mol m-3 have also been mentioned in this discussion, but this could be a misunderstanding. Best wishes, Alison ________________________________ This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
