Dear Heiko,

Thank you for raising this.  Indeed, the name, units and definition are fine 
and these names should have been added. I have now marked them as
"accepted" for publication which means they will definitely go in at the next 
update of the standard name table. (You are fine to go ahead and use the
names in the meantime).

While checking on the stokes names  I also came across another name you 
proposed, fog_area_fraction, that was discussed and agreed in 2013 so I have 
accepted that one as well. The full details of all three names can be viewed at 
http://cfeditor.ceda.ac.uk/proposals/1?status=active&namefilter=&proposerfilter=Heiko&descfilter=&unitfilter=&yearfilter=&filter+and+display=Filter.

Best wishes,
 Alison

------
Alison Pamment                                 Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival    Email: [email protected]
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory     
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Heiko Klein
> Sent: 02 June 2015 14:08
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard-name for stokes drift
> 
> Hi,
> 
> more than two years ago I asked for standard-names for stokes drift and
> I got acceptance for the ones below. Unfortunately, it does not appear
> in the current standard-name list, so I'm sending a reminder.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Heiko
> 
> 
> On 2013-05-08 12:58, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> > Dear Heiko
> >
> >> sea_surface_wave_stokes_drift_x_velocity
> >> sea_surface_wave_stokes_drift_y_velocity
> >>
> >> units: m/s
> >>
> >> description:
> >> A velocity is a vector quantity. "x" indicates a vector component
> >> along the grid x-axis, positive with increasing x. The Stokes drift
> >> velocity is the average velocity when following a specific fluid
> >> parcel as it travels with the fluid flow. For instance, a particle
> >> floating at the free surface of water waves, experiences a net
> >> Stokes drift velocity in the direction of wave propagation.
> >
> > That seems fine to me (not being an expert on sea surface waves).
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Jonathan
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> >
> 
> --
> Dr. Heiko Klein                   Norwegian Meteorological Institute
> Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58             P.O. Box 43 Blindern
> http://www.met.no                 0313 Oslo NORWAY
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to