Dear Heiko We have to agree a new format for the source of the CF document, because the existing one appears hard to maintain, and that's one reason why CF 1.7 has not been completed. I hope this will be sorted out soon. All agreed tickets will be implemented.
In fact, I don't see why we shouldn't decide now on the list of tickets which will be included in CF 1.7 and say that people can put CF-1.7 into the Conventions attribute now, although the document itself does not exist. What do others think? Best wishes Jonathan ----- Forwarded message from Heiko Klein <[email protected]> ----- > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:35:15 +0200 > From: Heiko Klein <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Roms: ocean_s_coordinate_g1 and g2? > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 > Thunderbird/31.7.0 > > Dear all, > > three years ago, Rich submitted the addition for a new > ocean_s_coordinates_g* to the ticket system: > http://cf-trac.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/93 The ticket was approved by 3 > authors and accepted in 2012. > > When will this ticket be available in the CF document? What needs to > be done? (And why does the ticket have 'low' priority?) > > Best regards, > > Heiko > > > On 2012-07-18 07:52, Heiko Klein wrote: > >Rich, > > > >it must have been the netcdf-java package where I have seen these > >standard-names. The description on the netcdf-java pages are outdated, > >still using formula_terms a and b. I just checked the code, and that is > >up to date working with the formula_term -array C(k). > > > >It'll be good to have an official version. Thanks for picking this up > >again. > > > >Heiko > > > > > >On 2012-07-17 17:13, Rich Signell wrote: > >>Heiko, > >> > >>We worked with John Caron several years ago to get these into the CDM > >>in the NetCDF-Java library, so if you have g1 or g2 coordinates they > >>will work with codes that use NetCDF-java (like the Matlab NCTOOLBOX > >>and Unidata's IDV), and I remember we drafted up some documentation > >>to submit to CF, but looks like we dropped the ball. I'll pick it > >>up again. > >> > >>-Rich > >> > >>On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Heiko Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>I'm currently working with ROMS ocean model files. The model uses a > >>>generalized ocean_s coordinate as defined by > >>>https://www.myroms.org/wiki/index.php/Vertical_S-coordinate . > >>> > >>>The same page says that their s_coordinate is covered by standard_names > >>> ocean_s_coordinate_g1 > >>> ocean_s_coordinate_g2 > >>>and I believe I have seen at least the g1 case in a draft of a CF > >>>convention > >>>some month ago. Both cases are also implemented in the netcdf-java > >>>package > >>>with above standard_names: > >>>http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/reference/StandardCoordinateTransforms.html > >>> > >>> > >>>But I cannot find any of those names any longer, neither in CF-1.6 > >>>nor in > >>>the standard_names tables. > >>> > >>>Does somebody remember what happened to these vertical coordinates? > >>>According to the ROMS Wiki, the standard_names have been added in March > >>>2009. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>Best regards, > >>> > >>>Heiko > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>CF-metadata mailing list > >>>[email protected] > >>>http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Dr. Heiko Klein Norwegian Meteorological Institute > Tel. + 47 22 96 32 58 P.O. Box 43 Blindern > http://www.met.no 0313 Oslo NORWAY > _______________________________________________ > CF-metadata mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
