Hi all -

I thought I should re-post this with a more clear subject line, in case
anyone else wants to to weigh in on the definitions, or lack
thereof,  of albedo and air pressure.

Are these self-describing enough that they don't need to be
defined in CF?  Or should we add at least a minimal definition?

Thanks -
Nan

On 7/14/15 3:22 PM, Nan Galbraith wrote:
Thanks for raising this, Maarten; we should fix the albedo definitions. I use surface_albedo regularly, but didn't actually have a definition handy, so went
googling.

This one's from wikipedia:

Albedo is the ratio of reflected radiation from the surface to incident
radiation upon it. Its dimensionless nature lets it be expressed as a
percentage and is measured on a scale from zero for no reflection of
a perfectly black surface to 1 for perfect reflection of a white surface.

This one's from ESR.org (earth and space research) and is narrower, specific
to earth's surface:

Albedo is the fraction of solar energy (shortwave radiation) reflected from the Earth back into space. It is a measure of the reflectivity of the earth's
surface.

I propose we could add the sentence 'Albedo is the ratio of reflected radiation from the surface to incident radiation upon it' - or something similar - to all 3 albedo
definitions.

For air_pressure_at_cloud_top, well, the definition of air_pressure is 'No help available.'
so I guess that's a problem.

If we use sea_water_pressure as an example, here's that definition: '"Sea water pressure" is
the pressure that exists in the medium of sea water.'  True enough.

Cheers - Nan


On 7/10/15 10:47 AM, Maarten Sneep wrote:
Hi,

I came across a few descriptions in the standard name list that seem 'off', or clearly unclear.

surface_albedo: "The surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere." (this doesn't define albedo itself).

planetary_albedo: "No help available."

cloud_albedo: "The albedo of cloud." (this doesn't define albedo itself either, and is not very specific).

air_pressure_at_cloud_top: "cloud_top refers to the top of the highest cloud." (This apears very much a modelled parameter, not a parameter from some remote sensing technique. Either the description is kept deliberately vague, or I miss something. It is hard to use this description on observations).

I'm sure there are more, but these caught my eye. I'm not sure how to change the descriptions, I don't know the history of these quantities in the standard name list. Can someone advise how to proceed?

Best,

Maarten Sneep




--
*******************************************************
* Nan Galbraith        Information Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes Group            Mail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution                *
* Woods Hole, MA 02543                 (508) 289-2444 *
*******************************************************


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to