Karl,

This is not in CF. There is a statement that many assume that bounds are at the midpoints between coordinate values, but it then points out that this is not a convention. That's as close as it gets. If it was there in the past it is gone now.

Grace and peace,

Jim

On 12/22/15 12:07 PM, Karl Taylor wrote:
Hi John,

this is a bit of a tangent, but you state:
"Another possible use case is to represent contiguous bounds, where lower_bounds(i+1) == upper_bounds(i), then one only needs n+1 values instead of 2*n."

I seem to recall this option in CF, but recently I was reviewing the bounds specification, and I can't see where this is allowed. Was it in the original standard and subsequently removed? Or am I just unable to fine where it says you don't need the 2nd dimension on bounds in this case?

best regards,
Karl

On 12/22/15 8:39 AM, John Caron wrote:
Hi David:

At the risk of giving more useful answers to the wrong question, i will say that we could do something other than require ancillary or coordinate variables to only have dimensions that the parent variable has. There just must be a simple and explicit rule for mapping between parent and child dimension.

We went down that path with DSG, in order to efficiently store ragged arrays. Another possible use case is to represent contiguous bounds, where lower_bounds(i+1) == upper_bounds(i), then one only needs n+1 values instead of 2*n.

Anyway, i think the rule of only allowing dimensions that are in the parent is a good one, but for compelling use cases, we could also allow "simple and explicit" alternatives.

regards,
John

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:07 AM, David Hassell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hello all,

    Many thanks for the replies. It seems there is only support for the
    case that ancillary variable dimensions must be a subset of their
    parent variable dimensions (treating scalar coordinate variables like
    size 1 coordinate variables for the sake of a snappier sentence - oh,
    that's blown it).

    This reminded of an old thread about this that Mark started
    (http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2013/056162.html).
    In
    this thread Jim convincingly argues for an ancillary variable which
    can have size-greater-than-one dimensions which the parent variable
    does not span
    (http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2013/056215.html):

      "As an example, let's say that I have a variable a[X,Y,T], which
       contains the total energy deposited per day into the atmosphere by
       charged particles (from the solar wind & Van Allen belts) on a
       lon/lat grid as a function of time.  (Something I used to work on
       many years ago.)  Let's then say that I have another variable,
       b[X,Y,Z], which represents the model atmosphere density profile on
       the same lon/lat grid as a function of altitude.  This density
       profile was used in the calculation of the energy deposition
    values
       stored in variable a.  Variable b is clearly valid as an ancillary
       variable for a, isn't it?"

    Mark raised a defect ticket (#98) about this, but withdrew it in
    light
    of the lack of supprt from the mailing list discussion.

    However, variable b in Jim's example seems to me to be storing
    "sub-grid scale information", so if we are to allow that we
    perhaps we
    ought to allow coordinate variables which sub-grid values and
    which do
    not span their any of their variable dimensions. For example, we
    might
    want to store the longitude coordinates which contributed to a zonal
    mean. The size 1 dimension case I originally raised is merely a
    special case of this, I feel.

    But I do not think that there is any appetite for this at this time,
    and certainly not from me. John - your comment here was actually very
    useful!

    So, I now think that ancillary variable dimensions should be a subset
    of their asssociated data variable dimensions (which includes the
    possibility of ancillary variables have no dimensions). Perhaps, in
    the new year, ticket #98 could be reopened as an enhancement ...

    All the best,

    David


    ---- Original message from Karl Taylor (01PM 21 Dec 15)

    > Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:59:33 -0800
    > From: Karl Taylor <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] [CF Metadata] Question about ancillary
    >  variables/formula terms variables
    > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0)
    >  Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
    >
    > Hi David,
    >
    > I can't think of anyone needing these constructs, although
    there are
    > cases when both the "parent" and ancillary or formula_terms
    variable
    > might *both* have a scalar dimension.
    >
    > Karl
    >
    > On 12/21/15 7:41 AM, David Hassell wrote:
    > >Hello,
    > >
    > >I was wondering if anyone has ever had use for an ancillary
    variable
    > >(or data variable pointed to from a formula_terms attribute),
    having a
    > >size 1 dimension which the "parent" field does *not* have. The
    > >convention do not say anything about this.
    > >
    > >For example:
    > >
    > >   dimensions:
    > >     t = 1;
    > >     x = 96;
    > >     y = 73;
    > >   variables:
    > >     float q(x, y) ;
    > >       q:standard_name = "specific_humidity" ;
    > >       q:units = "g/g" ;
    > >       q:ancillary_variables = "q_error_limit" ;
    > >     float q_error_limit(t, x, y)
    > >       q_error_limit:standard_name = "specific_humidity
    standard_error" ;
    > >       q_error_limit:units = "g/g" ;
    > >Similary for a scalar coordinate variable, which is logically
    > >equivalent to the size 1 dimension case (this time shown on a
    formula
    > >terms variable):
    > >   dimensions:
    > >     x = 96;
    > >     y = 73;
    > >     z = 19;
    > >   variables:
    > >     float q(z, x, y) ;
    > >       q:standard_name = "specific_humidity" ;
    > >       q:units = "g/g" ;
    > >     float z(z):
    > >       z:standard_name = "atmosphere_hybrid_height_coordinate";
    > >       z.formula_terms = "a: var1 b: var2 orog: var3"
    > >
    > >     float var3(x, y):
    > >       time:coordinates = "time";
    > >
    > >     float time:
    > >       time:standard_name = "time";
    > >       time:units = "days since 2000-12-1";
    > >
    > >Thanks for your help,
    > >
    > >All the best,
    > >
    > >David
    > >
    > >
    > >--
    > >David Hassell
    > >National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS)
    > >Department of Meteorology, University of Reading,
    > >Earley Gate, PO Box 243,
    > >Reading RG6 6BB, U.K.
    > >
    > >Tel   : +44 118 3785613
    > >E-mail: [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    > >_______________________________________________
    > >CF-metadata mailing list
    > >[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > >http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > CF-metadata mailing list
    > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


    --
    David Hassell
    National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS)
    Department of Meteorology, University of Reading,
    Earley Gate, PO Box 243,
    Reading RG6 6BB, U.K.

    Tel   : +44 118 3785613 <tel:%2B44%20118%203785613>
    E-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    _______________________________________________
    CF-metadata mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata




_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata



_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

--
CICS-NC <http://www.cicsnc.org/> Visit us on
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc>         *Jim Biard*
*Research Scholar*
Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/>
North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/>
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/>
/formerly NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center/
151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
e: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
o: +1 828 271 4900

/Connect with us on Facebook for climate <https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and ocean and geophysics <https://www.facebook.com/NOAANCEIoceangeo> information, and follow us on Twitter at @NOAANCEIclimate <https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIclimate> and @NOAANCEIocngeo <https://twitter.com/NOAANCEIocngeo>. /


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to