Hi Alison, That's great. No problem regarding the delay - making all our datasets fully CF compliant is still a work in progress!
Thanks, Dan -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 02 March 2016 17:40 To: Hollis, Dan; [email protected] Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] New standard name: number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold Dear Dan, My apologies for not having published this long ago - I think it was a simple oversight. The name was indeed agreed in the original discussion and I have now marked it as "Accepted" in my editor, which means it will automatically be added into version 31 of the standard name table. Best wishes, Alison ------ Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065 Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Email: [email protected] STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory R25, 2.22 Harwell Campus, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K. > -----Original Message----- > From: Hollis, Dan [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 26 February 2016 10:34 > To: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP); [email protected] > Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] New standard name: > number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold > > Hi Alison, > > As far as I can tell there have been no objections to my proposal. > Would it be possible to add it to the standard name table please? > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 03 September 2014 13:07 > To: Hollis, Dan; Gregory, Jonathan; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] New standard name: > number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold > > Dear Dan, > > Thanks for your standard name proposal - you have done all that is > necessary for it to be 'picked up'. I am the person responsible for > updating the standard name table (the latest version can be viewed on > the CF website at > http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-standard-names/27/build/cf- > standard-name-table.html). I also maintain a list of proposals that > are in the pipeline, so to speak, which is linked from the website > 'Discussions' page > (http://cfconventions.org/discussion.html) or can be viewed directly > at > http://cfeditor.ceda.ac.uk/proposals/1?status=active&namefilter=&propo > s erfilter=&descfilter=&filter+and+display=filter. Your proposal has > been added to this list. (N.B. I am also in the process of adding > other recent proposals to bring the list up to date as it hasn't been > done for a while). > > I agree with Jonathan that your proposal for > number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold is fine and > since it is so similar to an existing name I think that unless anyone > raises any objections within the next week it can be accepted for > publication in the standard name table. > > Best wishes, > Alison > > ------ > Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065 > NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre Email: [email protected] > STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > R25, 2.22 > Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hollis, Dan [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 03 September 2014 11:20 > > To: Gregory, Jonathan; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New standard name: > > number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > Thanks for your support for the proposed standard name. > > > > I'm new to this process. I appreciate more time needs to be given to > > allow others to comment but I was wondering if there is anything > > else I need to do i.e. assuming there are no objections raised via > > the mailing list will the Standard Names Committee pick this up > > automatically and add it to the next release? > > > > Regards, > > > > Dan > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: CF-metadata [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf > > Of Jonathan Gregory > > Sent: 01 September 2014 17:36 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [CF-metadata] New standard name: > > number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold > > > > Dear Dan > > > > > number_of_days_with_surface_temperature_below_threshold > > > > > > The definition would be similar to that for the existing standard > > > name > > 'number_of_days_with_air_temperature_below_threshold', the only > > difference being that it would relate to surface temperature rather > > than air temperature. We require this to allow us to store values of > > the number of days of ground frost i.e. the number of days when the > > grass minimum temperature (= surface temperature) dropped below 0 > > degC. Following the approach for air temperature, the threshold > > would be specified via a coordinate variable called 'surface_temperature'. > > > > That seems fine to me. Thanks for your efforts to convert to CF. > > > > Cheers > > > > Jonathan > > _______________________________________________ > > CF-metadata mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata > > _______________________________________________ > > CF-metadata mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata > -- > Scanned by iCritical. _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
