Dear Lars

Answers to some of your points:

> 1. Is there a standard name for "diurnal temperature range", or a combined 
> standard name/cell method representation? Cf. the 2010 mail archive thread 
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2010/054016.html that added 
> "range" to Appendix E.

The cell_method of range was approved in ticket 65
http://cf-trac.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/65
and will be added in CF 1.7, which is under preparation. You could use this,
in combination with time bounds, to describe a diurnal range.

> 2. 'Heating Degree Days' and similar: I take it this was resolved/decided to 
> have standard name "integral_of_air_temperature_deficit_wrt_time" (or 
> ..._excess_...), with canonical units K s  in this post 
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2005/051014.html . However, 
> as the threshold is not explicitly referred to in the standard name, how is 
> this linkage formally established? A practical example would be helpful. 

The data variable of the integral should have a scalar coordinate variable
or a size-one coordinate variable with the standard name of air_temperature_
threshold, to indicate the threshold. I agree, this should be in the
description of the integral standard names.

> 3. Several of the standard names directly targeted at climate indices (e.g. 
> "spell_length_.....", "number_of_days_...") are dimensionless because the 
> unit is already included in the standard name. This is of course consistent 
> and parsimonious in terms of describing the data. But with respect of a 
> software package producing a plot that needs a legend with units attached, it 
> is not very enlightening to have the unit "1". For example, in a map of Frost 
> Days the title drawn from the long name or the comment may be something like 
> "Number of Frost Days (Tmin < 0 degC)" but the color scale should preferably 
> have units "days" rather than "1".  As this is not specific to climate 
> indices, what is the CF accepted advice or solution to this?

The spell_length variables have canonical units of days. The number_of_days
variables have canonical units of 1, as you say. This is logical. Could you
use the standard name, including the phrase "number_of_days", to derive the
appropriate label?

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to