Hello All,

In CMIP5 the variable "basin" was used as a fixed spatial field with integer 
values and the CF Standard Name "region", which has the definition "A variable 
with the standard name of region contains strings which indicate geographical 
regions. These strings must be chosen from the standard region list."

The integer valued CMIP5 variable is clearly not consistent with this 
definition. The CMIP5 variable was defined with flag_values and flag_meanings, 
such that the flag_meanings were from the CF standard region list.

The question is, should we redefine the CMIP5 variable somehow, or would it be 
acceptable to adjust the CF Standard Name definition for region to accept this 
usage which appears clear enough and is presumably much easier for plotting 
packages to handle than a spatial array of string values,

regards,
Martin


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to