Dear Jonathan, > I think we could omit "refrozen" here. Of course it's true, although I suppose > snow must also fall on it, but it's not necessary to say it, I suggest. Would > thickness_of_ice_on_sea_ice_melt_pond > be all right?
This would certainly be all right, thanks. > It may still be needed to have sea_ice_melt_pond as an area_type as well, > since you might wish to calculate a mean of the thickness over the melt-pond > area only (rather than the sea-ice area, the sea area or the whole grid-box). This is true, and it would be great if we could add this area type to the CF convention. Best, Dirk _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
