Hello, I was having a discussion regarding rosette mounted transmissometers, specifically the Wetlabs C-Star.
The most obvious standard name for the measurement appears to be: volume_beam_attenuation_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water However, because of the way the instrument is calibrated, the attenuation due to the (pure) water itself is not a constituent of the reported attenuation coefficient. The resulting modification would appear to be: volume_beam_attenuation_coefficient_of_radiative_flux_in_sea_water_not_due_to_water (or some variant, _not_due_to_pure_water) Is there a better way to account for reporting parameters which are the result of all processes except for some known process? Thanks, -Barna _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
