Dear Paul,

I've just had a look at the carbon dioxide surface flux names. Just to clarify, 
for your name surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide, I suggested that we 
use the existing name 
surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon which has 
canonical units of kg m-2 s-1. My understanding was that the existing name 
would be suitable for your needs. Is that correct or do you need a different 
quantity? As you say, we also have an existing name 
surface_downward_mole_flux_of_carbon_dioxide with units of mol m-2 s-1 so you 
should choose the standard name with the appropriate units for your quantity.

For molecular oxygen and dimethyl sulphide we have introduced mole_flux names, 
however, we could also add mass_flux names with units of kg m-2 s-1 if that is 
more useful for OMIP.

Please let me know if you need any additional names - these quantities are 
quite straight forward so I think we could just add them as necessary in the 
next update of the table.

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment                                                       Tel: +44 
1235 778065
Centre for Environmental Data Analysis         Email: [email protected]
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory     
R25, 2.22
Harwell Campus, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.


From: Durack, Paul J. [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 11 May 2017 20:49
To: [email protected]
Cc: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP); John Dunne - NOAA Federal; James Orr
Subject: OMIP standard_name surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide

In the large OMIP biogeochemistry request several carbon_dioxide names were 
requested. Of these surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide was rejected, 
as surface_downward_mole_flux_of_carbon_dioxide already exists.

This relates to variables contained in the Biogeochemistry sheet - 
https://goo.gl/Fyr6QW

The rejection of this name has led to the situation where requested 
carbon_dioxide variables have different units:

surface_downward_mole_flux_of_carbon_dioxide, mol m-2 s-1 (Omon, 162)
surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_natural_analogue_expressed_as_carbon,
 kg m-2 s-11 (Omon, 163)
surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_abiotic_analogue_expressed_as_carbon,
 kg m-2 s-11 (Omon, 164)
surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon14_dioxide_abiotic_analogue_expressed_as_carbon,
 kg m-2 s-11 (Omon, 165)
surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon13_dioxide_abiotic_analogue_expressed_as_carbon13,
 kg m-2 s-11 (Omon, 166)
surface_downward_mole_flux_of_molecular_oxygen, mol m-2 s-1 (Omon, 167)
surface_upward_mole_flux_of_dimethyl_sulfide, mol m-2 s-1 (Omon, 168)

I wonder if this can be reconsidered so there is some consistency between the 
carbon_dioxide standard names and their units.

Cheers,

P
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to