Maybe instead of ' radar_quality_index' NCEI could use a more general
approach; an ancillary variable of radar_qc, and then a standard attribute
that describes how the  QC variable is calculated.

As far as I know there's no way, currently,  to provide such a description in
a way that would be clear to data users, but this approach would avoid a
proliferation of quality_index standard names.

I don't know about different radar systems, but a very similar concept could be
applied to ADCP data, perhaps by combining echo amplitude and percent good
to get a more 'complete' QC variable. We don't routinely do that, but it might be useful, if we had a standard way to document the meaning of the resulting QC
value and the way it was calculated.

Cheers - Nan


On 10/5/17 1:00 PM, Jim Biard wrote:

Hi.

There needs to be a full definition of the quantity that is more precise than the sentence below. Keep in mind that not every quantity needs a standard name. I have one question in particular. Is this a quantity that is comparable across different radars?

Grace and peace,

Jim


On 10/5/17 12:21 PM, Heather Brown - NOAA Affiliate wrote:
Folks,

Are there any opinion and/or thoughts to adding this standard name?

Thanks,
H

Heather Brown


On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Brian Nelson - NOAA Federal <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I would like to request a standard name for a variable that
    defines the quality of a ground based radar based on the combined
    measure of beam blockage and the effects of vertical profile of
    reflectivity.

    There is no such standard name available nor does an existing one
    meet the requirements.

    The name should be:  radar_quality_index
    Units : dimensionless (1)

    Thanks
    Brian





--
*******************************************************
* Nan Galbraith        Information Systems Specialist *
* Upper Ocean Processes Group            Mail Stop 29 *
* Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution                *
* Woods Hole, MA 02543                 (508) 289-2444 *
*******************************************************


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to