Forgive me. Since "X" and "Y" are just placeholders for the actual
variables, it's obviously not important if they were exchanged from
normal practice in the discussion. The important thing is whatever
follows "of" in the construct is the integrand.
thanks,
Karl
On 10/24/17 3:56 PM, Karl Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
I think "X" should be the independent variable and "Y", the dependent
variable (appearing as the integrand). I would then prefer
"integral_over_X_of_Y" or "integral_of_Y_over_X" (although I wouldn't
object if the consensus is that "wrt" should replace "over"). [I
don't like "integral_wrt_Y_of_X" because that seems to say that X is
the integrand.]
best,
Karl
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:15:53PM +0100, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:15:53 +0100
From: Jonathan Gregory <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New standard names for OMIP: physics
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Dear Alison cc Steve, Paul
Sorry for slow response. I've read Steve's edited version and I
agree with
your and Steve's proposals. Thanks. Changing all the
integral_of_X_wrt_Y to
integration_wrt_Y_of_X will make them more readable, I think, and
it's a
I meant integral_wrt_Y_of_X of course. Sorry.
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
