Hi Folks, I would like to suggest that if folks are seriously interested in pursuing the notion of moving CF Ontologies forward, then they register the idea with the ongoing Google Summer of Code efforts taking place at ESIP [0]. We already have issues registered for SWEET Ontology Alignments and improvements to the ESIP Community Ontology Repository. I see no reason we couldn't work as a community on advancing this at Google's expense for the benefit of ESIP and the CF community. If you are interested, either let me know here, personally or simply log the issue and describe what you think such an effort would look like. As I mentioned previously, there is already tooling available for generating RDF representations of the CF standard names [2]. I would see this as the first step in building richer semantics around existing CF resources. Lewis
[0] https://github.com/ESIPFed/GSoC/issues [1] https://github.com/ESIPFed/GSoC/issues/5 [2] https://github.com/mmisw/cf2rdf On 1/31/18, 6:48 AM, "CF-metadata on behalf of [email protected]" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Send CF-metadata mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CF-metadata digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: CF Ontologies (Jonathan Gregory) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:48:50 +0000 From: Jonathan Gregory <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] CF Ontologies Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear Chris The web page to which I gave a link writes down the rules for constructing the standard names (of some years ago, but presumably it could be updated). This would help with some new standard name proposals, which use existing patterns and vocabulary, or existing patterns with new vocabulary that obviously fits. The more difficult proposals, which involve most thinking, involve new concepts and patterns. Best wishes Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
