Dear Martin,

Thank you for proposing these two C4MIP names. They both look good to me - I've 
added some definitions.

1. CMIP6 sort name nppStem. Net Primary Production Allocated to Stem

> For the related variables nppOther and nppLeaf respetively, we have
> net_primary_productivity_of_biomass_expressed_as_carbon_accumulated_in_miscellaneous_living_matter,
>  and 
> net_primary_productivity_of_biomass_expressed_as_carbon_accumulated_in_leaves.
> 
> Adapting the latter for stems, I propose:
> 
> net_primary_productivity_of_biomass_expressed_as_carbon_accumulated_in_stems 
> (kg m-2 s-1)
' "Production of carbon" means the production of biomass expressed as the mass 
of carbon which it contains. Net primary production is the excess of gross 
primary production (rate of synthesis of biomass from inorganic precursors) by 
autotrophs ("producers"), for example, photosynthesis in plants or 
phytoplankton, over the rate at which the autotrophs themselves respire some of 
this biomass. "Productivity" means production per unit area. The phrase 
"expressed_as" is used in the construction A_expressed_as_B, where B is a 
chemical constituent of A. It means that the quantity indicated by the standard 
name is calculated solely with respect to the B contained in A, neglecting all 
other chemical constituents of A. The stem of a plant is the axis that bears 
buds and shoots with leaves and, at its basal end, roots. Its function is to 
carry water and nutrients. Examples include the stalk of a plant or the main 
trunk of a tree.'

I have constructed the definition from existing text. This is very similar to 
existing names. The name, units and definition are fine. This name is accepted 
for publication in the standard name table and will be added in the May update.

2.  CMIP6 short name fNAnthDisturb. nitrogen mass flux out of land due to any 
human activity

> This is the nitrogen equivalent of  fAnthDisturb which has standard name:
> 
> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_anthropogenic_emission
> 
> Following existing usage, this can be adapted as:
> 
> tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_nitrogen_compounds_expressed_as_nitrogen_due_to_anthropogenic_emission
>  (kg m-2 s-1)
> 
> Note, however, the discussion here: 
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/060106.html, in which 
> Jonathan has questioned 
> this kind of use of "expressed_as".

I think we have now resolved the question about this use of expressed_as and 
have decided it is okay! 
(http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/060156.html, proposal 
3; http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/060158.html). Hence I 
think your current proposal is fine:
tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_nitrogen_compounds_expressed_as_nitrogen_due_to_anthropogenic_emission
 (kg m-2 s-1)
'The phrase "tendency_of_X" means derivative of X with respect to time. 
"Content" indicates a quantity per unit area. The "atmosphere content" of a 
quantity refers to the vertical integral from the surface to the top of the 
atmosphere. For the content between specified levels in the atmosphere, 
standard names including "content_of_atmosphere_layer" are used. The phrase 
"expressed_as" is used in the construction A_expressed_as_B, where B is a 
chemical constituent of A. It means that the quantity indicated by the standard 
name is calculated solely with respect to the B contained in A, neglecting all 
other chemical constituents of A. "Nitrogen compounds" summarizes all chemical 
species containing nitrogen atoms. The list of individual species that are 
included in this quantity can vary between models. Where possible, the data 
variable should be accompanied by a complete description of the species 
represented, for example, by using a comment attribute. The specification of a 
physical pro
 cess by the phrase "due_to_" process means that the quantity named is a single 
term in a sum of terms which together compose the general quantity named by 
omitting the phrase. "Emission" means emission from a primary source located 
anywhere within the atmosphere, including at the lower boundary (i.e. the 
surface of the earth). "Emission" is a process entirely distinct from 
"re-emission" which is used in some standard names. "Anthropogenic" means 
influenced, caused, or created by human activity.'

I have constructed the definition from existing text. This name is accepted for 
publication in the standard name table and will be added in the May update.

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment                                 Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data Archival    Email: [email protected]
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory     
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.

From: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP) 
Sent: 25 April 2018 11:26
To: CF Metadata List <[email protected]>
Cc: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP) <[email protected]>; Jones, Chris 
D <[email protected]>
Subject: C4MIP: final two terms for CMIP6

Dear All,

following heroic efforts by Alison, Chris and others, there are only two terms 
remaining in the C4MIP request that need new standard names. Both are simple 
variations of names that have recently been approved.
1. nppStem  Net Primary Production Allocated to Stem [kg m-2 s-1] 

For the related variables nppOther and nppLeaf respetively, we have 
net_primary_productivity_of_biomass_expressed_as_carbon_accumulated_in_miscellaneous_living_matter,
 and 
net_primary_productivity_of_biomass_expressed_as_carbon_accumulated_in_leaves.

Adapting the latter for stems, I propose:

net_primary_productivity_of_biomass_expressed_as_carbon_accumulated_in_stems
2.  fNAnthDisturb nitrogen mass flux out of land due to any human activity [kg 
m-2 s-1]

This is the nitrogen equivalent of  fAnthDisturb which has standard name:

tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_anthropogenic_emission

Following existing usage, this can be adapted as:

tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_nitrogen_compounds_expressed_as_nitrogen_due_to_anthropogenic_emission


Note, however, the discussion here: 
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/060106.html, in which 
Jonathan has questioned this kind of use of "expressed_as".


regards,
Martin


_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to