Hi Stephen,

thanks, that is clear. There may be an issue with the CF standard name ... we 
usually have "integral_wrt_depth" in the name for such quantities. Perhaps 
Jonathan or Alison can comment on that,


regards,

Martin


________________________________
From: Stephen Griffies - NOAA Federal <[email protected]>
Sent: 10 June 2018 16:52
To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP)
Cc: [email protected]; Jonathan Gregory; Karl Taylor; Pamment, Alison 
(STFC,RAL,RALSP); Durack, Paul J.
Subject: Re: 
tendency_of_sea_water_conservative_temperature_expressed_as_heat_content units

Hi,

Thanks for the question.

As discussed in Griffies et al (2016), we request heat and salt budgets to be 
integrated over the thickness of a grid cell.  For the heat budget, this 
thickness weighting then leads to units of W m-2 rather than W m-3.

There is a good reason to ask for the diagnosed budgets to be integrated over 
the thickness of a grid cell.  Namely, most ocean models have time-dependent 
grid cell thicknesses. So the only way to ensure budgets can be closed with 
offline diagnostics is to have each model perform the thickness weighting 
online.

Make sense?

Best,
   Stephen



On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear Jonathan, Stephen, Karl,


I'm puzzled by the units of the CMIP6 variable ocontemptend and teh associated 
standard name 
tendency_of_sea_water_conservative_temperature_expressed_as_heat_content  -- in 
the data request and the standard name table respectively with units "W m-2". 
This is consistent with the Griffies et al 2016 paper on ocean diagnostics and 
with the discussion on the CF mailing list. However, it is requested as a 
function of depth, so I would expect to see units of "W m-3" for the tendency 
of a heat density.


The units "W m-2" are usually used for a surface heat flux. There are a number 
of variables related to ocontemptend with the same units.


Am I missing something, or should we change the units or the depth dependency?


regards,

Martin





--
Dr. Stephen M. Griffies
NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Lab
201 Forrestal Road
Princeton, NJ 08542
USA

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to