Hello All,

there is a problem with the way 4 CMIP6 variables use standard names defined 
for tendencies due to sedimentation. Sedimentation in CF means sedimentation in 
water, so sedimentation of a substance always leads to a negative tendency of 
the amount of that substance suspended in the ocean. In CMIP6, following CMIP5 
usage, standard names for tendencies of amounts of substances in the ocean have 
been used for variables with long names which imply that they are negative 
tendencies, i.e. loss rates. E.g.

- frfe "Iron Loss to Sediments"  
tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_iron_due_to_sedimentation.


We recently dealt with a similar issue for atmospheric deposition rates: 
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/020204.html and the 
solution (http://cfeditor.ceda.ac.uk/proposal/3225 ) was to introduce new 
standard names of the form "minus_tendency_...".


For the four ocean variables (frfe, frn, fric, froc) I propose 4 new standard 
names:

 minus_tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_inorganic_carbon_due_to_sedimentation
 minus_tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_organic_carbon_due_to_sedimentation
minus_tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_iron_due_to_sedimentation (as in CMIP5)
minus_tendency_of_ocean_mole_content_of_elemental_nitrogen_due_to_denitrification_and_sedimentation


These all correspond to minus one times the quantity defined by existing 
standard names.


More details about the 4 CMIP variables are given on the Data Request github 
site: 
https://github.com/cmip6dr/CMIP6_DataRequest_VariableDefinitions/issues/344


regards,

Martin

<http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2018/020204.html>
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to